![]() But the hacker problem is not solely a Battlefield problem. If you can name me an online multiplayer game that does not have a hacker problem please do tell. But two hours in two breakthrough maps where both teams are mostly the same players and eventually you will convince yourself that the player at the top of the list must be hacking. So some rounds you will dominate and others you will be smashed. Compared to the way COD, Warzone, Apex, PUBG, Overwatch and most of the coop shooters where every new round is against a random sample of those online. Without ranked matches, by playing round after round in the same server you will play multiple rounds against players that are much better than you. It's not that Battlefield has more or less hackers then any other game it's just the way the multiplayer works. Hacking and cheating in online games is a universal problem on PC. Information, Guides and Announcements for the EA app.If they are violating the TOS by using hacks, well that is a different case and should be dealt with accordingly. You don't have the right to dictate to someone else how they can run their persistent server. The TOS clearly allow player run persistent servers with the ability to admin as they see fit. I wouldn't complain about the admins or their rules.Īs far as laws, you are just wrong. I've played on bad private servers that I just wouldnt go back to. I think it was a big mistake to kill private servers in favor of pushing people towards public ones. Right now BF1/5 public servers are the same with hackers. In the BF3/4 days, private servers were the only servers dealing with hackers and the EA public servers were rampant with hackers. Now we are left with only the in-game "report" function, which is a joke. I think one of EAs biggest mistakes was taking away the BF3/4 style private servers with back end access to data. My question is why would you want to play on a server you think has cheaters and hostile admins when there are ample amounts of servers available to play on. ![]() Long live Strike on Karkand and Wake Island. I've been playing since BF2 as well and like you its my most played FPS by far. ![]() Player name is, If I am not spelling wrong. And without law, there would be nothing left. If such a situation is allowed, the law will have no meaning. I repeat, just because some pay for something does not mean that he can abuse the local permission he has against other fair players. I was kicked and banned from their server, just because he had the paid authority which is not audited and controlled by any other objective third party or EA. We need to remember that just because someone pay to own a server or a service, or a game account does not entitle him to do anything he wants.(Fair usage) There are laws, rules. Very hostile approach, disrespectful tongue, zero manners by the owner or shareholder of the aforementioned server (BITE2042).(Just because he wanted to ban for personal satisfaction) I was banned just because I claimed that there could be cheaters etc. I was playing in the server called BITE2042. I want to see sanctions against players and illegitimate actions. This is unacceptable and very against customers rights, since its affecting their paid services which they buy to have some distract from daily life and spend good times playing fair. ![]() But there are not actions taken, no ban. Recently I noticed that There are many players are cheating with some sort of tool apps and, we report them. I can say its only game I mostly played ever since we got the internet connection to our homes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |